Residual DNA Testing Services

Creative Protomics has developed a comprehensive residual DNA (rDNA) testing solution covering CHO, E. coli, Vero, and Pichia pastoris host cells. This advanced platform offers:

  • High sequence specificity for accurate detection
  • Exceptional sensitivity to identify even trace amounts of DNA
  • Strong reproducibility ensuring consistent results
  • High-throughput capabilities for efficient large-scale testing

These advantages make our solution widely adopted for residual DNA quantification in biopharmaceutical development and manufacturing.

Submit Your Request Now

Submit Your Request Now

×
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Solutions
  • Advantages
  • FAQ

Why Is Strict Control of Residual Host Cell DNA Essential?

In the current biotherapeutical industry, different host cells, such as CHO, hybridoma & engineered bacteria strains in the bio-reactors can be utilized for the manufacturing of protein therapeutics. But limited by current purification techniques, low levels of host DNA, in different sizes and physical forms, may still remain in the final products even after effective purification during manufacturing.

Residual host cell DNA refers to fragments or longer molecules of DNA that may remain in biologic products after manufacturing. These residual DNA fragments originate from host cells used in production and can pose significant risks, including:

Infection and Carcinogenicity Risks

Residual DNA may carry infectious viral genomes, such as HIV, which can integrate into human chromosomes, replicate, and generate infectious virus particles.

It may also contain oncogenes, potentially increasing the carcinogenicity risk of biologic products.

Immunogenicity Risks

Residual DNA can trigger pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), leading to nonspecific immune responses.

Studies have shown that high doses of nucleic acids (such as DNA vaccines or CpG oligodeoxynucleotides) can induce undesirable immune reactions.

Given these risks, regulatory agencies worldwide have established strict residual DNA limits for biologics. Pharmacopeias provide standardized testing methods to ensure compliance. Implementing robust residual DNA testing is crucial for monitoring the production process and ensuring the safety and quality of biopharmaceuticals.

Regulatory Standards for Residual Host Cell DNA

Global regulatory agencies have set strict limits on residual host cell DNA in biologic products to ensure safety and quality. Compliance with these standards is critical for regulatory approval, and various pharmacopeias outline validated testing methods for accurate DNA quantification.

Residual DNA Limits by Regulatory Guidelines

Regulatory AuthorityProduct TypeResidual DNA Limit
U.S. FDA Final biologic products≤10 ng/dose

Host cell-derived products≤100 pg/dose
European Pharmacopeia Host cell-derived products≤10 ng/dose

Inactivated hepatitis A vaccine≤100 pg/dose

Hepatitis B vaccine≤10 pg/dose

Comparison of Common Residual DNA Testing Methods

Selecting the right residual DNA testing method is essential for accurate quantification and regulatory compliance. Below is a comparison of widely used techniques:

MethodRegulatory GuidanceSpecificitySensitivityTime RequiredDetection Range
DNA Probe Hybridization U.S. FDA, European PharmacopeiaMedium10 fg/HL5-6 hours0.01-100 pg/μL
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) U.S. FDA, European PharmacopeiaHigh1 fg/HL1-1.5 hours0.01-100 pg/μL
Threshold Method U.S. FDALow1 pg/HL0.5-1 hour1.25-80 pg/μL
Immunoassay (ELISA) U.S. FDALow1 pg/HL0.5-1 hour1.25-80 pg/μL
Fluorescent Staining European PharmacopeiaLow1 pg/HL0.5-1 hour1.25-80 pg/μL

Among these, quantitative PCR (qPCR) has become the gold standard due to its:

  • High sensitivity and specificity for detecting trace DNA
  • Accuracy and reproducibility in quantification
  • Rapid turnaround time for efficient process monitoring
  • Robust performance, unaffected by DNA fragmentation

Implementing qPCR-based residual DNA testing ensures compliance, product quality, and patient safety, making it the preferred method for bioprocess development and quality control.

Residual DNA Detection Solutions of Your Biopharmaceutical

To address the safety concerns associated with residual host cell DNA in biologics, Creative Protomics has developed a proprietary extraction and detection system. Our optimized qPCR protocol enables rapid and efficient quantification of residual DNA in biopharmaceutical products.

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) for Residual DNA Detection

Principle of qPCR-Based Residual DNA Testing

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is a gold standard technique for measuring host cell DNA contamination in biologics. This method enables real-time monitoring of DNA amplification by detecting fluorescence signals from dye-based detection or probe-based assays.

When the fluorescence intensity reaches a predefined threshold, the initial DNA template concentration shows a linear correlation with the cycle threshold (Ct) value. By generating a standard curve using known DNA concentrations, the exact residual DNA amount in a sample can be accurately quantified.

Residual Host Cell DNA qPCR Testing Workflow

  • Sample Preparation – Utilizes an advanced anti-interference lysis system for efficient sample processing.
  • High-Efficiency DNA Extraction – Incorporates column membrane technology for maximum DNA recovery (≥95% yield).
  • Real-Time Quantification – Uses a dual-control qPCR system for precise measurement.
  • Data Analysis – Generates accurate quantification reports for regulatory compliance.

With its high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, qPCR has become the preferred method for biopharmaceutical process monitoring and quality control.

Direct quantitative detection of host cell residual DNA in recombinant Filgrastim by qPCR. (Gholizadeh-Hashjin, A., et al.; 2021)

Why Choose Our qPCR Detection Solution?

Our qPCR-based residual DNA testing offers a highly sensitive, specific, and reliable solution for biopharmaceutical quality control.

Key Advantages:

High Sensitivity & Accuracy – Detects DNA as low as 0.01 pg/μL with excellent reproducibility and batch-to-batch consistency.

Strong Specificity – Minimal cross-reactivity with non-target species, ensuring accurate results.

Robust & Versatile – DNA fragmentation does not affect detection outcomes, and the assay is compatible with standard PCR instruments.

Fast & Efficient – Pre-diluted calibration standards simplify qPCR setup, improving workflow efficiency.

Wide Linear Detection Range – Supports quantification from 0.01 to 100 pg/μL, maintaining high amplification efficiency.

Reliable Target Detection – Specific primers and probes ensure selective amplification of host cell DNA while resisting interference from foreign genomic fragments.

Consistent Results with Fragmented DNA – qPCR amplification and standard curve performance remain unaffected by DNA fragmentation, ensuring precise quantification.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Residual DNA Testing

Why is qPCR becoming the gold standard for residual DNA detection?

qPCR offers pg-level sensitivity, high specificity, and meets pharmacopeial requirements for standard curve validation. It enables direct quantification, making it ideal for process monitoring in biologics manufacturing.

What could cause false-positive or false-negative qPCR results?

False positives – Sample contamination or primer dimer formation.

False negatives – Improper sample preparation (e.g., DNA degradation) or poorly designed primers.

How can I ensure the reliability of my qPCR assay?

Method validation should include:

Spike-recovery tests (acceptable range: 50%–150%)

Precision analysis (relative standard deviation RSD ≤30%)

Specificity testing (to exclude non-target DNA interference)

Learn about other Q&A.

References

  1. Li, S. M., Bai, F. L., Xu, W. J., Yang, Y. B., An, Y., Li, T. H., ... & Wang, W. F. (2014). Removing residual DNA from Vero-cell culture-derived human rabies vaccine by using nuclease. Biologicals, 42(5), 271-276. DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2014.06.005
  2. World Health Organization. (1987). Acceptability of cell substrates for production of biologicals: report of a WHO study group [meeting held in Geneva from 18 to 19 November 1986]. WHO Technical Report Series, No. 747.
  3. Grachev, V., Magrath, D., Griffiths, E., & Petricciani, J. C. (1998). WHO requirements for the use of animal cells as in vitro substrates for the production of biologicals (requirements for biological substances No. 50). Biologicals, 26(3), 175-193. DOI: 10.1006/biol.1998.0153
  4. European Pharmacopoeia Commission. (2019). European Pharmacopoeia 9.8. Strasbourg: European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare.

Proteomics Sample Submission Guidelines

Ensure your samples are prepared and submitted correctly by downloading our comprehensive Proteomics Sample Submission Guidelines. This document provides detailed instructions and essential information to facilitate a smooth submission process. Click the link below to access the PDF and ensure your submission meets all necessary criteria.

Proteomics Sample Submission Guidelines
* For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.
Our customer service representatives are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Inquiry

Support Documents

We have prepared a variety of materials for anyone interested in our solutions. Here are some of our recommended materials for your review!
See All Resources→

From Our Clients

Online Inquiry

Please submit a detailed description of your project. We will provide you with a customized project plan to meet your research requests. You can also send emails directly to for inquiries.

* Email
Phone
* Service & Products of Interest
Services Required and Project Description
* Verification Code
Verification Code

Great Minds Choose Creative Proteomics