Get Your Custom Quote

Online Inquiry

Explore Creative Proteomics’ Functional Protein Microarray Service for biomarker discovery, neoantigen mapping, and high-throughput protein analysis.

Get Your Custom Quote

Functional Protein Microarray Service

Discover disease biomarkers, neoantigens, and protein interactions with confidence using our functional protein microarray service. By preserving native protein structure and enabling multiplexed detection of autoantibodies and ligands, we help researchers, pharma teams, and CROs accelerate biomarker discovery, validate therapeutic targets, and ensure drug selectivity with minimal sample input. Our platform combines >1,800 fully folded proteins, rigorous QC, and advanced data analysis, providing reliable, reproducible results trusted by leading biomedical projects.

  • Native-Fold Proteins: Ensures accurate functional readouts and minimizes false negatives.
  • High Throughput: Screen thousands of proteins simultaneously for rapid discovery.
  • Multiplex Detection: Profile IgG, IgA, IgM, or ligands in a single assay.
  • Validated & Reproducible: Supported by case studies and extensive QC metrics.
Creative Proteomics’ functional protein microarray service.

What is a Functional Protein Microarray?

A functional protein microarray is a high-density platform that displays correctly folded and biologically active proteins immobilized onto a solid surface. Unlike peptide arrays or denatured protein arrays, functional arrays preserve the native conformation of proteins, enabling the study of physiologically relevant binding interactions.

The protein microarray allows thousands of proteins to be interrogated simultaneously using minimal sample volume. This enables researchers to evaluate autoantibody responses, protein–protein interactions, enzyme activities, or small molecule binding in a single experiment. The ability to study native-fold proteins ensures more accurate representation of biological events, making functional protein microarrays a powerful tool in both discovery research and applied drug development.

Classification of protein microarrays.

Figure 1. Classification of protein microarrays: analytical and functional protein microarrays (Zhu H, Qian J., 2012).

Why Choose Functional Protein Microarrays Over Other Proteomic Screens?

Functional protein microarrays offer several advantages over conventional proteomics and immunoassays:

Functional protein microarrays combine scale, sensitivity, and versatility compared to methods such as ELISA, Western blotting, or Co-Immunoprecipitation. They complement mass spectrometry-based proteomics by providing an accessible and reproducible screening format for hypothesis generation.

Creative Proteomics' Functional Protein Microarray Service Workflow

Our functional protein microarray service follows a robust and validated workflow to ensure reproducible results:

Functional protein microarray service workflow.

Protein Folding, Quality Control, and Functional Integrity

Only correctly folded proteins are biotinylated and immobilized, ensuring that immobilized proteins retain biological activity. Our platform is the use of biotin carboxyl carrier protein (BCCP) fusion tags as folding markers. Additional QC measures include:

SDS-PAGE and Western blot validation

Functional ligand-binding assays

Internal positive/negative controls printed on each array

Replicates for statistical reproducibility

Deliverables and Reporting Standards

Applications of Functional Protein Microarray

Sample Requirements

Sample Type Recommended Volume Storage Conditions Notes
Serum 20–50 µL -80°C, avoid repeated freeze-thaw Use clot activator tubes; centrifuge to remove cells
Plasma 20–50 µL -80°C, avoid repeated freeze-thaw Collect in EDTA, citrate, or heparin tubes; remove platelets
CSF 10–30 µL -80°C Avoid contamination with blood; centrifuge if necessary
Other body fluids 20–50 µL -80°C Pre-clarify by centrifugation; consult for unusual fluids
Hemolyzed samples Not recommended N/A Hemoglobin may interfere with detection
Lipemic samples Not recommended N/A High lipid content may affect signal intensity

Why Choose Creative Proteomics for Functional Protein Microarray Service

FAQ

Q1: Can multiple antibody types be detected simultaneously?

A1: Yes. We can profile IgG, IgA, IgM, and other antibody types at the same time. This allows a comprehensive view of the immune response in a single experiment.

Q2: Can the protein arrays be customized for specific research needs?

A2: Absolutely. We offer custom panels tailored to your project, including disease-specific proteins, signaling molecules, or any proteins of interest. Panels can be designed for discovery or targeted validation studies.

Q3: Are there any limitations should be aware of?

A3: Functional protein microarrays work best for soluble proteins and antibodies. Very low-abundance targets may require enrichment or orthogonal validation. We recommend complementary follow-up methods such as mass spectrometry or Co-IP for confirmation.

Q4: Can the assay distinguish between closely related proteins?

A4: Yes. Arrays are designed with carefully validated proteins to minimize cross-reactivity, allowing distinction between isoforms or homologous proteins in most cases.

Demo

Demo: A quantitative protein interaction network for the ErbB receptors using protein microarrays

This study employed protein microarrays containing nearly all human SH2 and PTB domains to map interactions with 61 tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides from the four ErbB receptors, generating over 77,000 measurements. The resulting quantitative network revealed 116 novel interactions and showed distinct receptor behaviors: ErbB2 exhibited high promiscuity, EGFR and ErbB2 became more promiscuous at higher concentrations, while ErbB3 remained selective. These findings highlight differences in receptor signaling dynamics and suggest that concentration-dependent promiscuity may underlie the strong oncogenic potential of EGFR and ErbB2, offering insights for therapeutic strategies.

Measuring the binding affinity using protein microarrays

Figure 2. Measuring the binding affinity of SH2/PTB domains for phosphopeptides derived from the ErbB receptors using protein microarrays (Jones R B, et al., 2006).

Demo: SARS-CoV-2 multi-antigen protein microarray for detailed characterization of antibody responses in COVID-19 patients

The group constructed a protein microarray, then profiled patient sera to map binding across variants in parallel. The microarray enabled simultaneous binding and variant-specific analyses from microliter samples and helped distinguish infection vs vaccine-elicited responses and variant cross-reactivity. Methodologically it is a clear example of applying functional/antigen microarrays for high-throughput immunomonitoring.

Antibody responses to S variants with single and double mutations.

Figure 3. Antibody responses to S variants with single and double mutations in sera from COVID-19 patients (Celikgil A, et al., 2023).

Case Study

Case: Identification of potential autoantigens in anti-CCP-positive and anti-CCP-negative rheumatoid arthritis using citrulline-specific protein arrays.

Abstract

Antibodies against citrullinated proteins (ACPAs) are a hallmark of many rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and define clinically and pathogenically distinct patient subgroups. Mapping the breadth of citrullinated protein targets (the "auto-antigenome") can reveal candidate biomarkers and provide insight into PAD enzyme (PAD2/PAD4) contributions to neoepitope generation. To identify proteins that become recognized by ACPAs after in-array citrullination and to compare PAD2 versus PAD4 efficiency in generating ACPA-binding citrullinated epitopes in plasma from anti-CCP-positive and anti-CCP-negative RA patients. The study aimed to generate a large candidate list of potential citrullinated autoantigens for downstream validation.

Methods

  • Platform: A high-density protein microarray containing 1,631 full-length proteins printed in quadruplicate was used.
  • Samples: Plasma pools from 15 anti-CCP-positive and 10 anti-CCP-negative RA patients (pooled separately) were applied.
  • PTM treatment: Arrays were treated with recombinant human PAD2 or PAD4 to generate citrullinated proteins under defined buffer conditions.
  • Detection & analysis: Bound IgG autoantibodies were detected by fluorescent scanning; raw intensities underwent background subtraction, quantile/intensity normalization, z-score filtering and statistical testing.

Results

  • After citrullination, 844/1,631 arrayed proteins were recognized by ACPAs under the assay conditions, indicating extensive ACPA reactivity across many proteins.
  • Applying additional filtering to prioritize higher-intensity and reproducible signals yielded ≈100 high-confidence potential autoantigens.
  • PAD2 and PAD4 showed broadly similar efficiency in generating epitopes recognized by ACPAs at the tested serum dilution; only a handful of proteins displayed PAD-isoform-preferential ACPA binding.
  • The authors note that many hits were low-intensity and emphasize that in-vitro citrullination does not guarantee in-vivo relevance without orthogonal validation.
Imaging of autoantibody binding to protein arrays.

Figure 4. Imaging of autoantibody binding to citrullinated and non-citrullinated protein arrays.

Categories on the protein microarray.

Figure 5. Protein categories on the protein microarray.

Conclusion

The study demonstrates that high-density functional protein microarrays provide a scalable approach to map candidate citrullinated autoantigens in RA. The large set of ACPA-reactive proteins represents a resource for hypothesis generation and subsequent validation by orthogonal methods. The comparable activity of PAD2 and PAD4 under the experimental conditions suggests both enzymes can generate ACPA-recognized neoepitopes, although biological relevance requires further investigation.

Related Services

References

Tell Us About Your Project