Get Your Custom Quote

Online Inquiry

Map protein targets and off-targets efficiently with Creative Proteomics' Thermal Proteome Profiling, delivering high-quality, actionable insights.

Get Your Custom Quote

Thermal Proteome Profiling (TPP) Service

Unlock the full potential of your proteomics research with our Thermal Proteome Profiling (TPP) service, designed to map protein targets, uncover off-target interactions, and reveal pathway-level changes directly in cells and tissues. Researchers and pharma teams often face the challenge of connecting active phenotypes to specific molecular targets. Creative Proteomics' probe-free, proteome-wide TPP approach solves this by measuring protein stability shifts with high precision, delivering actionable insights that guide mechanism-of-action studies, target validation, and functional prioritization.

  • Proteome-wide coverage: Simultaneously analyze thousands of proteins to identify both expected and unexpected targets.
  • Probe-free and label-free: Study compounds in their native form without chemical modification.
  • Actionable insights: Prioritized protein targets, pathway mapping, and off-target detection to inform follow-up studies.
  • Trusted expertise: Decades of experience, validated workflows, and advanced LC–MS/MS instrumentation ensure high-quality results.
Creative Proteomics' Thermal Proteome Profiling Service.

What is Thermal Proteome Profiling (TPP)?

Thermal Proteome Profiling (TPP) is a proteomics approach that links ligand or compound binding to changes in protein thermal stability. Proteins exhibit characteristic melting profiles, and when bound by a small molecule or metabolite, their thermal stability may increase or decrease. By measuring protein solubility across a temperature gradient, TPP allows unbiased identification of on-targets, off-targets, and mechanistic changes in native cellular and tissue environments. Thermal proteome profiling enables unbiased, proteome-wide identification of protein target engagement and pathway-level effects, bridging phenotypic observations with molecular mechanisms in drug discovery & and translational proteomics

Experimental setup of TPP.

Figure 1. Thermal proteome profiling (TPP) experimental setup (Mateus A, et al., 2020).

Advantages of TPP for Drug Target Identification

Data Analysis and Interpretation

Complementary Techniques and Multi-Omics Integration

TPP results can be integrated with other proteomics and omics approaches to provide a holistic understanding:

How Thermal Proteome Profiling Works?

Workflow of thermal proteome profiling.

Deliverables and Reporting Standards

Applications of TPP in Biomedical Research

Sample Requirements

Sample type Recommended input (typical) Handling & storage
Adherent cell lines 1–5 × 107 cells per condition Keep on ice after harvest, snap-freeze pellets if not processed immediately; avoid repeated freeze–thaw.
Suspension cell lines 1–5 × 107 cells per condition Pellet cells quickly at 4°C, freeze pellets on dry ice if needed.
Fresh or frozen tissues ≥50 mg fresh tissue or equivalent frozen material per condition Store at −80°C; keep tissue frozen until lysis.
Cell/tissue lysates ≥50–100 µg total protein per temperature point Keep on ice during processing; aliquot and freeze at −80°C if not immediately digested.
Purified proteins / recombinant enzymes 1–10 µg per assay point Store per protein specifications; avoid detergents that affect thermal behavior.

Why Choose Creative Proteomics for TPP?

Creative Proteomics provides comprehensive TPP services, backed by over 20 years of expertise in quantitative proteomics. Key advantages include:

FAQ

Q1: What formats of TPP experiments are commonly used?

A1: Common TPP formats include temperature range experiments (TPP-TR), concentration range experiments (TPP-CCR), and combined two-dimensional experiments (2D-TPP).

Q2: Is TPP probe‑free and label‑free?

A2: Yes, TPP itself does not require chemical modification of compounds (probe‑free), though it typically uses multiplexing labels (e.g., TMT) for quantitative mass spectrometry.

Q3: What factors influence TPP results?

A3: Temperature range selection, compound concentration, sample type, protein abundance, and data processing methods all affect the detection of thermal shifts.

Q4: What are common limitations of TPP?

A4: Limitations include reliance on detectable protein abundance, complexity of data analysis, and challenges in analyzing membrane proteins without solubilization strategies.

Q5: How does TPP compare with other target identification methods?

A5: Unlike affinity purification that uses probes or tags, TPP detects physical consequences of ligand binding on protein stability, offering unbiased proteome‑wide insights without prior modification of compounds.

Demo

Demo: Thermal proteome profiling reveals fructose-1,6-bisphosphate as a phosphate donor to activate phosphoglycerate mutase 1

TPP of FBP-interacting proteins.

Figure 2. Thermal proteome profiling (TPP) of FBP-interacting proteins (Zhang Y, et al., 2024).

Case Study

Case: Characterization of a small molecule inhibitor of disulfide reductases that induces oxidative stress and lethality in lung cancer cells

Abstract

The primary aim was to identify the protein targets responsible for the selective cytotoxicity of a small molecule (referred to in the paper as a hit from a lung cancer screen) toward lung adenocarcinoma cells, and to validate whether those targets explain the observed induction of oxidative stress and cell death. The authors intended to show that TPP can discover biologically meaningful effectors from a phenotypic hit and to validate the biochemical and cellular consequences of target engagement.

Methods

  • Applied thermal proteome profiling (TPP) on treated cancer cell lysates/cells to detect protein thermal-stability shifts after LCS3 exposure.
  • Quantitative mass spectrometry (TMT/LC–MS/MS) reconstructed melting curves and prioritized hits.
  • Follow-up validation included purified-enzyme activity assays, functional cellular assays, and a genome-wide CRISPR screen to link targets to sensitivity.

Results

  • TPP nominated the disulfide reductases GSR and TXNRD1 as top targets.
  • Biochemical assays confirmed LCS3 inhibits these enzymes; treated cells showed increased reactive-oxygen-species signaling and an NRF2-like oxidative-stress response.
  • A CRISPR screen identified genetic modifiers that modulate sensitivity, supporting the biological relevance of the identified targets.
ROS and NRF2 pathway activated by LCS3.

Figure 3. LCS3 induces ROS and NRF2 pathway activation.

TPP identifies candidate LCS3-interacting proteins.

Figure 4. TPP identifies candidate LCS3-interacting proteins that mediate redox homeostasis.

Conclusion

TPP successfully deconvoluted the compound's mechanism: LCS3 directly engages and inhibits GSR and TXNRD1, disrupting cellular redox buffering and causing selective cytotoxicity in susceptible lung adenocarcinoma cells. Orthogonal biochemical and genetic validation established these proteins as functionally meaningful effectors of the phenotype.

Related Services

References

For research purposes only, not intended for clinical diagnosis, treatment, or individual health assessments.

Tell Us About Your Project